Reigate and Banstead
Reigate and Banstead/24/02325/TPO
33 Haroldslea Drive Horley Surrey RH6 9DT
- Reference
- Reigate and Banstead/24/02325/TPO
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead
- Application type
- Tree preservation order
- Address
- 33 Haroldslea Drive Horley Surrey RH6 9DT
- Postcode
- RH6 9DT
- Status
- Decided (Refused)
- Decision
- Refused
- Received
- 19 Dec 2024
- Validated
- 19 Dec 2024
- Started
- 19 Dec 2024
- Decided
- 13 Feb 2025
- Source council
- Reigate and Banstead
- Council source record
- View public record
- Public data licence
- Open Government Licence v3.0
- Record updated
- 18 Jul 2026
- SEO index generated
- 24 Jul 2026
Location
Approximate location
Proposal
T1 Oak - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugs. TPO Ref: TPO 424 (T10 on schedule)1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2.The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between £15,000 and £80,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured. 4. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 5. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ?pollarding? of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 6. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 07/01/2021 clearly links the Oak T1 as the cause of damage to the risk a
Key dates
- Received 19 Dec 2024
- Validated 19 Dec 2024
- Started 19 Dec 2024
- Decided 13 Feb 2025
Planning history / related applications
No related planning applications have been identified in the current public OGL dataset.
Inside plotEdge
Go beyond the public record
This page is the public OGL record. plotEdge adds the private intelligence layer for this site - open it in the app to unlock:
- Ownership & title Registered owner and title from HM Land Registry.
- Viability & build potential Site scoring and development upside.
- Constraints Flood risk, green belt, conservation areas and designations.
- Approval signal Planning risk and approval-likelihood analysis.
- Comparable applications Decisions on similar nearby sites, side by side.
- Status alerts Get notified the moment this application changes.
Source: public planning application data from Reigate and Banstead, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. View the council source record. Council documents and drawings are not republished on plotEdge.